Wednesday, November 26, 2025

llyods cyber

How you integrate pipeline?
What type of challenges you faced when doing this pipeline?
How you improved pipelines?
What are the steps you follow when you want to decomm any asset or application?
Explain me 2-3 complex scenarios where your involvement is comtributed?
What decisions you took and gave any long term benefits with your decision?
Llyods have 5 values we put customers first,be bold,inclusive,we are trust driven,we put community together.Explain each value with a real time scenario


Story telling
===========

Below is a storytelling script for each question, written in a conversational, confident, leadership-oriented tone.
You can speak this exactly in the interview — it sounds natural, senior, and impressive.


---

🎤 1. “How do you integrate a CI/CD pipeline?” — Storytelling Version

Story Script:

“When I integrate a CI/CD pipeline, I treat it like onboarding a new team member — it should be reliable, predictable, and add value from Day 1.

In one of my previous projects, we were modernising a legacy Wealth Management application. Developers were pushing code manually, deployments took hours, and production had frequent issues.

So I integrated a full CI/CD pipeline:

When developers committed code, the build automatically started

Unit tests, code quality, and security scans were triggered

Container images were packaged and stored in an artifact registry

Deployments to OpenShift were handled through GitOps using ArgoCD

Production deployments went via canary rollout based on error rates and latency


The entire process became automated end-to-end.
Earlier, a release used to take 4 hours. After CI/CD, it took 15 minutes.

So my approach is simple:
Build → Scan → Test → Package → Deploy → Observe → Rollback
All backed with automation and quality gates.”


---

🎤 2. “What are the stages of a CI/CD pipeline?” — Storytelling Version

Story Script:

“I explain pipeline stages just like a quality-controlled assembly line in a car factory.

1. Code Stage – Engineers write and review the code.


2. Integration Stage – Code is built, unit tested, and checked for quality.


3. Security Stage – SAST, SCA, container scans.


4. Delivery Stage – App is deployed to DEV/UAT automatically.


5. Governance Stage – Approvals, change management, compliance checks.


6. Production Stage – Canary or blue–green with observability gates.


7. Feedback Stage – Metrics, SLOs, DORA metrics.



Just like each step in a factory ensures no faulty part moves forward, each pipeline stage ensures no faulty code goes to production.”


---

🎤 3. “What challenges did you face in pipelines?” — Storytelling Version

Story Script:

“One major challenge I faced was inconsistent environments.
The pipeline passed in Jenkins, but failed in OpenShift due to different versions of runtime libraries.

Another challenge was long execution times — our test suite took 45 minutes, and developers were waiting idle.

Security scans also slowed things down; they used to run only at the end, leading to last-minute security blockers.

Also, we faced configuration drift — what was defined in Git didn’t match what was running in production.

These real-world issues taught me that pipelines need as much care as production systems.”


---

🎤 4. “How did you improve your pipelines?” — Storytelling Version

Story Script:

“I improved our pipelines by introducing three transformative changes.

First, I created reusable pipeline templates — any new team could adopt CI/CD in hours instead of days.

Second, I parallelized tasks. Earlier, unit tests, linting, and security scans were sequential; I made them run together. Build time reduced by more than half.

Third, I introduced GitOps so deployments were traceable, auditable, and rollback-ready.

As a result, our deployment frequency increased, failures dropped, and teams became more confident.”


---

🎤 5. “What steps do you follow to decommission an application?” — Storytelling Version

Story Script:

“I follow a structured 7-step decommission framework.

Recently, we had to retire a legacy mutual funds reporting system. First, I validated ownership and mapped dependencies — we discovered several hidden AutoSys jobs and two BI dashboards relying on it.

Second, we performed a risk assessment and agreed on a cutover plan with business, security, and architecture.

Third, we archived all historical data as per retention policy.

Fourth, we disabled traffic, removed DNS, deleted OpenShift deployments, databases, pipelines, and rotated certificates.

Finally, we updated CMDB and documented cost savings.

This structured approach ensured zero customer impact and full compliance.”


---

🎤 6. “Explain 2–3 complex scenarios where your contribution mattered.” — Storytelling Version


---

Scenario 1 — Kubernetes Probe Misconfiguration Causing DB Outage

“Once, we had an outage because a liveness probe was triggering a heavy DB call every 30 seconds.
Pods kept restarting… the DB connection pool got exhausted… customers couldn’t log in.

When I joined the bridge:

I identified the probe design as the root cause

Created a lightweight /healthz endpoint

Tuned readiness and liveness probes

Added connection pooling limits

Documented the best practice for all teams


Post fix — zero incidents. This became a bank-wide learning.”


---

Scenario 2 — Kafka MTLS Certificate Chain Issue

“In another case, after a certificate rotation, Kafka producers couldn’t talk to brokers. TLS handshake failed and message lag shot up.

I detected that the intermediate CA was missing in the truststore.

I automated certificate chain validation in CI and set up early expiry alerts.
What was a recurring problem turned into a zero-incident domain for the entire year.”


---

Scenario 3 — Ansible Zero-Downtime Patching

“We were having 2 hours downtime every month during patching for 150 apps.

I built a rolling-patching pipeline using Ansible:

Cordon a node

Drain workloads

Patch

Health-check

Move to next node


We achieved 100% zero downtime.
Teams kept their SLAs intact and business loved it.”


---

🎤 7. “What decisions did you take that gave long-term benefits?” — Storytelling Version

Story Script:

“One long-term decision was moving the whole organisation to GitOps.
Before GitOps, configurations drifted and debugging took forever.
After GitOps, everything was traceable and consistent.

Another decision was automating certificate lifecycle — earlier, certificate expiry was a repeating Sev1 issue. After automation, we never had another TLS outage.

Finally, I enforced an SRE Production Readiness Checklist — covering probes, autoscaling, monitoring, dashboards, SLOs, and alerting.
This single framework reduced Sev1 incidents by 40%.”


---

🎤 8. Lloyds 5 Values — Storytelling Version


---

1. We Put Customers First — Story Storytelling

“One evening, a high-risk release was planned.
My team was ready, but monitoring showed latency spikes.
If we deployed, customers might face login failures.

I took the call to postpone the release, even though everything was prepared.

Yes, it delayed our timeline, but it protected customer experience.
This is what putting customers first means to me.”


---

2. Be Bold — Storytelling

“When teams hesitated to adopt GitOps, I sensed fear of the unknown.

I created a small pilot with one team, proved deployment time reduction, and showed success with real data.

Taking that bold step triggered a cultural shift — within three months, four squads adopted GitOps.”


---

3. Inclusive — Storytelling

“I noticed junior engineers struggling with Kubernetes YAMLs.

Instead of leaving them behind, I made reusable templates and conducted hands-on sessions.

Suddenly everyone — junior, senior, QA — could contribute to deployments.

That’s inclusion in action: making everyone part of the journey.”


---

4. Trust Driven — Storytelling

“We once had a production outage because of a manual config change.

Instead of blaming the engineer, I conducted a blameless postmortem — focusing on the process, not the person.

We improved automation, added guardrails, and the engineer felt supported, not punished.

Trust grows when people feel safe.”


---

5. Put Community Together — Storytelling

“In my previous organisation, platform teams worked in silos — Kafka, DB, SRE, OpenShift.

During incidents, alignment was painful.

I created a weekly ‘Production Readiness Community’ where all teams shared learnings and best practices.

Within weeks, coordination became smooth, incidents reduced, and we acted like one community — not isolated islands.”


-------‐--------‐-----‐-------'xx--'xxx----------------

Below is a complete, polished, interview-ready script for all the questions Lloyds asked you today.
These answers are structured, leadership-oriented, SRE-centric, and aligned to Lloyds’ culture and values.


---

✅ 1. How do you integrate a CI/CD pipeline?

Answer (Manager-Level):

“I integrate a CI/CD pipeline by treating it as a product—with clear stages, automated governance, security gates, and measurable outcomes. My approach is:**

1. Requirements & Architecture

Understand branching strategy (GitFlow / trunk-based).

Define environments (dev → test → UAT → prod).

Identify required gates (security scans, approvals, change management).


2. Build Pipeline Integration (CI)

Source code triggers build (Git webhook).

Run:

Unit tests

Static code analysis (SonarQube)

Dependency scanning (Snyk)

Container scanning (Trivy / Aqua)



3. Packaging & Artifact Management

Build container images

Store in artifact registry (ECR, JFrog, Nexus)


4. Deployment Pipeline Integration (CD)

Deploy to lower environments using:

ArgoCD / Tekton / Jenkins / Azure DevOps


Apply GitOps methodology for auditability.


5. Observability & Rollback

Implement logging, metrics, traces

Canary / blue–green deployments

Automated rollback if SLO degradation


6. Governance

Align with change management, security, and SRE production readiness.



---

✅ 2. What are different stages of a CI/CD pipeline?

Use this crisp framework:

1. Code Stage

Branching

Peer review

Pre-commit checks


2. Continuous Integration Stage

Build

Unit tests

Linting

Static code analysis


3. Security Stage

SAST

SCA / license scanning

Container scanning

Secrets detection


4. Continuous Delivery Stage

Deploy to DEV / QA

Integration testing

E2E validation


5. Approvals & Governance

Change management

Security sign-off

SRE production readiness checklist


6. Production Deployment

Canary / blue-green

Observability validation

Automated rollback


7. Continuous Feedback

Metrics

DORA KPIs

Post-deployment review



---

✅ 3. What challenges have you faced in pipelines?

Give real-world SRE challenges:

Challenge 1: Pipeline failures due to inconsistent environments

Example: Jenkins agent versions differed → builds succeeded in some nodes but failed in others.


Challenge 2: Long pipeline execution times

Testing stage took 45 minutes → delayed deployments.


Challenge 3: Security delays

SAST scans took 20 minutes → developers bypassed security gates.


Challenge 4: Drift between Git manifests & actual cluster state

ArgoCD out of sync → wrong configurations in production.


Challenge 5: Secrets accidentally committed

Sensitive configs leaked → required secret scanning and vault integration.



---

✅ 4. How did you improve the pipelines?

Improvement 1: Standardized reusable pipeline templates

Common YAML templates for all teams

Reduced onboarding time by 40%


Improvement 2: Introduced parallel execution

Unit tests + static analysis + scans ran in parallel

Reduced build time from 45 → 18 minutes


Improvement 3: Shift-left security

Pre-commit SAST scans

Secrets scanning hooks

Prevented security delays later


Improvement 4: Introduced GitOps

ArgoCD-based automated deployments

No manual interventions

Eliminated configuration drift


Improvement 5: End-to-end observability gates

Added quality gates based on:

Latency

Error rate

Resource usage


Automated rollback enabled



---

✅ 5. What steps do you follow to decommission any asset/application? (Enterprise-grade answer)

Use a 7-step decommission framework:

Step 1: Identify & Validate

Inventory CMDB

Ownership confirmation

Understand dependencies (API, DB, downstream jobs)


Step 2: Risk Assessment

Impact analysis

Compliance checks

Data retention requirements


Step 3: Communication & Approvals

Notify stakeholders

Get sign-off from:

Product owner

Business

Security

Architecture



Step 4: Freeze & Cutover

Disable traffic

DNS removal

Load balancers update

Stop CRON/AutoSys jobs


Step 5: Data Archival

Backup DB

Move logs to long-term storage


Step 6: Infra Decommission

Delete:

Kubernetes deployments

VMs

Databases

Certificates

Secrets

Pipelines

Storage volumes

Service accounts



Step 7: Audit & CMDB Update

Update CMDB

Cost saving documented

Final audit closure



---

✅ 6. Explain 2–3 complex scenarios where your involvement contributed

Scenario 1: OpenShift – Liveness Probe Misconfiguration Causing Outages

Problem: App restarts every 30 seconds → DB connection pool exhausted → downtime.
Root cause: Liveness probe hitting an expensive DB call.

My Contribution:

Changed probe to a lightweight /healthz endpoint

Increased initialDelaySeconds

Added connection pool limits

Set readinessProbe to prevent serving traffic until warm-up completed


Outcome:

0 outages after fix

Reduced DB CPU by 60%

Became a best practice across all squads



---

Scenario 2: Kafka Cluster MTLS Failure – Production Message Lag

Problem: Producer → Broker TLS handshake failed after certificate rotation.
Impact: Lag grew → order processing delayed by 40 minutes.

My Contribution:

Diagnosed that intermediate CA certificate missing in truststore

Automated certificate chain validation in CI

Implemented cert expiry alerts + rotation pipeline


Outcome:

No TLS incidents for 12 months

Reduced TLS outage risk by 90%



---

Scenario 3: Ansible Pipeline – Zero-Downtime Patching

Problem: Weekly patching caused 2 hours downtime for 150 applications.

My Contribution:

Built an Ansible rolling patching pipeline

Patch node → cordon → drain → upgrade → uncordon

Validated health checks before moving to next node


Outcome:

Achieved 100% zero-downtime patching

Saved ~50 hours/month operational effort

Became enterprise standard for patching



---

✅ 7. What decisions did you take that gave long-term benefits?

Decision 1: Moving to GitOps

Ensured infra + app config always stays in sync

Eliminated manual deployments

Long-term benefit: More stable, secure releases


Decision 2: Standardizing SRE Production Readiness Checklist

TLS, probes, scaling, autoscaling, logging, dashboards, SLOs

Long-term benefit: Reduced Sev1 incidents by 40%


Decision 3: Implementing Certificate Lifecycle Automation

Auto-renewal, auto-verification, auto-deployment

Long-term benefit: Zero certificate outages for a full year


Decision 4: Introducing DORA metrics & error budgets

Data-driven reliability

Long-term benefit: Improved change success rate by 30%



---

✅ 8. Lloyds 5 Values — Explain each with a real-time scenario


---

1. We Put Customers First

Scenario:
During OpenShift migration, a release was planned on a Friday evening.
Risk of outage was high.

My action:
I postponed release and asked for canary testing on Monday.

Impact:

Prevented weekend customer disruption

Reinforced customer trust



---

2. Be Bold

Scenario:
Two squads resisted GitOps fearing complexity.

My action:
I piloted GitOps with one team, proved deployment time reduction, then rolled it out.

Impact:

Faster deployments

Bold decision → changed culture across teams



---

3. Inclusive

Scenario:
Junior engineers struggled with Kubernetes YAMLs.

My action:
I built low-code templates and conducted 3 hands-on sessions.

Impact:

All skill levels contributed

Improved team velocity

Everyone felt part of the transformation



---

4. Trust Driven

Scenario:
We once had an incident where a manual config change broke production.

My action:
Instead of blaming, I conducted a blameless postmortem, focused on fixing the process.

Impact:

Team trusted leadership

We built automated config guards & audits



---

5. Put Community Together

Scenario:
Different platform teams (Kafka, OpenShift, SRE, DB, Security) operated in silos.

My action:
Created a weekly “Production Readiness Community Call” with cross-team collaboration.

Impact:

Shared best practices

Faster issue resolution

Higher reliability culture



---

⭐ Final Tip

If these points come naturally in your interview, you will immediately stand out as a senior technology leader with strong SRE + cybersecurity alignment, exactly what Lloyds looks for.


---

If you want, I can also prepare:
✔ A 2-minute introduction mixing SRE + cybersecurity + business value
✔ A storytelling script
✔ Mindmaps for easy revision
✔ A condensed one-page cheat sheet for tomorrow’s round


=================================
How do you establish the trust and make team comfortable 





Here is a perfect storytelling leadership answer that will impress Lloyds, especially because one of their core values is “We are trust-driven.”


---

🎤 How do you establish trust and make your team comfortable?

⭐ Storytelling, senior-leader, people-first answer

Story Script:

“I build trust the same way I build reliable systems — with consistency, transparency, and psychological safety.

One example from my previous team:
When I joined as a manager, the team had just come out of a stressful production incident where a junior engineer was blamed publicly for a configuration mistake.
Morale was low, and people were afraid to take ownership.

I knew trust would not come through policies — it had to come through behaviors.

So I started with three simple actions:

1. I made the environment psychologically safe

In the very next incident, instead of asking ‘Who did this?’, I asked:
‘What in the process allowed this issue to happen?’
People immediately felt safe to speak.
I made it clear:
Mistakes are learning points, not weapons.

2. I became fully transparent

Every week, I held a short session where I shared

what decisions were being made

why we were doing certain changes

what risks we were facing

how we could improve reliability
Teams felt included, not dictated to.


3. I showed trust before asking for trust

I started delegating real ownership —
like letting a mid-level engineer lead a production change with me shadowing quietly in the background.
When people see that you trust them, they rise to the occasion.

Slowly, the culture shifted.

Engineers who were silent earlier started speaking confidently.
People began volunteering for complex tasks.
Most importantly, they trusted one another — not just me.

And when the next major incident occurred, the team handled it collaboratively, calmly, and without fear.

To me, that’s how trust is built:
By showing respect, giving transparency, empowering people, and consistently standing by them especially during failures.
That’s how you transform a group of individuals into a strong, comfortable, high-performing team.”


---

⭐ Quick punchline (use in interview if needed)

“Trust is not built during the good days — it’s built during failures.
If the team sees you stand by them in tough moments, they will run with you during transformations.”


---

If you want, I can also give:
✔ A 1-minute crisp version
✔ A values-aligned version for Lloyds
✔ A real incident-based version from SRE / production support


Monday, November 24, 2025

llyods

Awesome, let’s lock this in so you can walk into the Lloyds SRE Manager interview with full confidence. I’ll give you:

1. A 30-minute storytelling mock interview script


2. 50 real-time scenarios (SRE, Kubernetes, observability, incidents) in a compact format


3. A downloadable cheat-sheet PDF you can revise quickly




---

1️⃣ 30-Minute Storytelling Mock Interview Script

Use this like a rehearsal. Read questions aloud and answer using the suggested flow.

Q1. “Tell me about yourself” (2–3 minutes)

Your flow:

> “I’m Raghuram, with 20+ years of experience in production support and SRE in banking and wealth management.

Currently I work at Wells Fargo as a Systems Operations Manager, responsible for more than 150+ business-critical applications – including trading platforms and financial products.

My core focus areas are:

Keeping platforms reliable and compliant using SRE practices

Running stable Kubernetes/OpenShift-based platforms

Strong incident/change/problem management

Building observability using Prometheus, Grafana, APM, and logs

Automation with CI/CD and removing manual, risky steps.


I see SRE and security as two sides of the same mission: protecting customer trust. Every outage is also a risk event, and every manual step is a control gap.

At Lloyds, I want to bring this mix of reliability, risk-thinking, and automation to help teams deliver faster, but safely and predictably.”




---

Q2. “Tell me about a major incident you led” (4–5 minutes)

Story to use: Kubernetes probe misconfiguration → DB connection pool exhaustion → DoS-like risk

Structure (STAR):

Situation:
“We had a trading application in wealth management running on Kubernetes. During peak hours, users saw random freezes of 5–7 minutes.”

Task:
“As the SRE/operations lead, I owned incident management, technical coordination, and restoring confidence.”

Action:

Correlated latency spikes in Grafana with APM traces.

Saw Kafka consumer lag increasing and DB connection pool hitting max.

Discovered readiness probe declared pods ‘ready’ before full Kafka/DB initialization.

Fixed probes, tuned DB pool, added rate limiting and PodDisruptionBudget.

Treated it as potential DoS-pattern – added alerts on abnormal resource spikes.


Result:

Issue eliminated; no repeat incidents.

Peak latency reduced by ~30–40%.

We adopted a standard “probe hardening” checklist for all services.


Cyber angle (say this explicitly):
“We classified this not just as a performance bug but as a risk scenario – resource starvation can be abused like a DoS. So we added preventive guardrails and better monitoring around that behavior.”



---

Q3. “How do you manage change risk in production?” (4–5 minutes)

Story to use: Manual DB change → schema drift → GitOps & CI/CD controls

Situation:
“Weekend batch jobs for a wealth management system failed right after a release.”

Task:
“I had to restore the batch, identify what slipped through, and fix the process.”

Action:

Traced failure to schema differences between UAT and PROD.

Found a manual DB patch had been applied directly in PROD, outside the pipeline.

Introduced:

GitOps (ArgoCD) for config and infra

DB schema validation as a pre-deployment step

Mandatory approvals & RBAC-based deployment rights

Audit trail of who changed what, when.



Result:

Eliminated schema-drift incidents in that platform.

Reduced release-related P1s significantly (you can say “by more than half, over the next quarter”).


Cyber angle:
“We treated config drift as both a stability and a control violation. After this, any change not traceable back to Git and CI/CD was simply not allowed.”



---

Q4. “How do you use SLOs, monitoring, and alerts?” (4–5 minutes)

Start with 4 Golden Signals: latency, traffic, errors, saturation.

Say you standardized:

Prometheus + Grafana dashboards for all critical apps

Application APM + logs (e.g., Splunk/ELK)

SLOs with error budgets (e.g., 99.9% availability for trading APIs).



Mini-story:

> “One platform used to raise alerts only on full outages. We changed that:

Defined SLOs for latency and error rates.

Set up warning alerts at 50% error budget consumption.

During one release, we saw early error-rate increase, auto-rollback triggered by pipeline.


This prevented a full-blown incident and protected both customer experience and risk exposure.”



Link back to security:

> “Strong observability also helps detect suspicious or abnormal behavior early. For us, performance anomalies are also potential threat indicators.”




---

Q5. “How do you lead war rooms and RCAs?” (4–5 minutes)

Talk through your leadership style:

Keep call structured:

Who’s on bridge? App, infra, DB, network, security if needed.

Timeboxing: 5–10 min data-collection, then decision.


Keep it blameless but accountable:

Facts first, no finger-pointing.

After incident: RCA – what failed in design, process, or controls.


Convert RCAs into:

Runbooks

Automated checks

Standard patterns (for probes, config, capacity, etc.)



Drop a short example:

> “After repetitive JVM outages, instead of blaming dev, we introduced memory leak checks in pre-prod load testing and created standard JVM tuning templates. Incidents reduced drastically.”




---

Q6. “How do you align SRE with security teams?” (3–4 minutes)

Key talking points:

“We treat availability, integrity, and confidentiality together — not separately.”

Examples:

RBAC for Kubernetes & OpenShift – only pipelines can deploy to prod.

No direct DB changes; all through approved scripts in Git.

Regular involvement of security in:

DR drills

Change governance

Arch reviews



Share a mini-story:
“For one platform, we tagged certain alerts as ‘high-risk’ (e.g., sudden CPU/memory spikes, strange traffic patterns) and these were automatically routed to both SRE and security on-call lists.”



---

Q7. “Why Lloyds and this SRE Manager role?” (2–3 minutes)

Tie it back to:

Large, regulated bank → strong focus on risk & controls

Your experience in:

Wealth management

Trading platforms

Complex production ecosystems


Say:


> “I’m excited by the chance to bring my experience handling 150+ critical applications into a place like Lloyds, where reliability and regulatory expectations are high. I enjoy building teams that can handle incidents calmly, automate aggressively, and work hand-in-hand with security to protect customer trust.”




---

2️⃣ 50 Real-Time Scenarios (Compact for Revision)

Each scenario: Problem → Detection → Root Cause → Mitigation

I’ll group them by theme so you can remember better.

A. Kubernetes / OpenShift (1–10)

1. Misconfigured readiness probe causing DB pool exhaustion

Detected via latency and DB connection graphs.

Root cause: probe marked pod ready too early.

Fix: correct probe, tune pool, add PDB and rate limits.



2. Liveness probe killing pods during slow GC

Detected via frequent restarts.

Root: aggressive timeout during full GC.

Fix: increase timeouts, add startupProbe, tune JVM.



3. Node not draining properly before maintenance

Detection: 5xx errors during node patching.

Root: missing PodDisruptionBudget.

Fix: define PDB, use cordon+drain with controlled eviction.



4. Pods scheduled on wrong nodes (no affinity)

Detection: noisy-neighbor performance issues.

Root: no nodeAffinity/resource constraints.

Fix: introduce affinity, taints/tolerations, and resource requests/limits.



5. ConfigMap change not rolled out to pods

Detection: app still using old config.

Root: no trigger to restart deployments on config change.

Fix: checksum annotations in deployment spec, or manual rollout restart.



6. ImagePullBackOff due to private registry auth issues

Detection: pod pending with ImagePullBackOff.

Root: bad imagePullSecret.

Fix: refresh credentials, centralize secret management, monitoring for pull failures.



7. Log volume explosion filling node disk

Detection: node disk alerts, kubelet issues.

Root: app logging debug in prod, no log rotation.

Fix: adjust log level, introduce log rotation, disk usage alerts.



8. CronJobs overlapping causing DB contention

Detection: DB locks / slow queries at specific times.

Root: job schedule overlap.

Fix: ‘concurrencyPolicy: Forbid’ or ‘Replace’, reschedule jobs.



9. Intermittent DNS failures inside cluster

Detection: random “host not found” in logs.

Root: CoreDNS resource limits too low.

Fix: scale CoreDNS, assign dedicated resources, add health checks.



10. OpenShift route misconfig causing SSL handshake failures

Detection: customers report SSL errors, logs show TLS handshake issues.

Root: wrong TLS termination config.

Fix: correct route configuration, standardize TLS policies.





---

B. Observability / Monitoring (11–20)

11. No single pane of glass across 150 apps

Detection: slow incident triage.

Root: fragmented tools and dashboards.

Fix: standard Grafana dashboards, naming conventions, golden signals.



12. Alert fatigue (hundreds of non-actionable alerts)

Detection: team ignores pages.

Root: too many noisy thresholds.

Fix: de-duplicate, introduce SLOs, route only actionable alerts.



13. Missing alerts for partial degradation

Detection: users complaining while monitoring is green.

Root: only up/down monitoring.

Fix: add latency and error-rate alerts, synthetic checks.



14. No correlation between app, infra, and logs

Detection: long RCA cycles.

Root: no unified tracing/correlation IDs.

Fix: standard correlation ID, integrated logs+APM+metrics.



15. Capacity issues only visible at end-of-month

Detection: spikes around EOM causing slowness.

Root: no capacity trend analysis.

Fix: capacity dashboards, predictive planning with business calendar.



16. Silent failures in batch jobs

Detection: business points out missing trades next morning.

Root: no monitoring on job outcome, only infra.

Fix: application-level SLI – records processed, failures, lag.



17. SSL certificate expiry causing outage

Detection: customers unable to connect, TLS errors.

Root: manual cert management.

Fix: centralized cert management, expiry alerts, automation.



18. Slow RCAs due to poor log search performance

Detection: 10–15 minutes to query logs.

Root: badly indexed fields, log retention design.

Fix: optimize indices, structured logging, tiered storage.



19. No business KPI monitoring (only technical)

Detection: issue where technical metrics looked fine, but revenue-impacting bug existed.

Root: missing business metrics.

Fix: add KPIs (transactions, failed orders) alongside infra metrics.



20. Prometheus scraping failures

Detection: gaps in metrics.

Root: wrong scrape configs, target changes.

Fix: service discovery, relabeling, alert on “no data”.





---

C. Incidents / Reliability / Platform (21–35)

21. JVM memory leaks causing trading app crashes

Detection: heap usage trend, GC logs.

Root: bad code path after feature release.

Fix: fix leak, add load test + chaos test, standard JVM baseline.



22. Autonomous restart loop after config change

Detection: pod flaps after deployment.

Root: invalid config not validated.

Fix: config validation in pipeline, canary release.



23. DR failover not working during actual outage

Detection: DR failed when needed.

Root: DR never tested end-to-end.

Fix: regular DR drills, automated runbooks.



24. High MTTR due to unclear ownership

Detection: war rooms wasting time identifying teams.

Root: no service catalog.

Fix: build service catalog, rota mapping, clear escalation paths.



25. Repeated incidents from same root cause

Detection: problem tickets show pattern.

Root: RCAs not resulting in real changes.

Fix: problem management with action tracking, no closure without prevention steps.



26. Unpatched OS leading to stability and risk issues

Detection: vendor advisories, infra incidents.

Root: irregular patching.

Fix: patch calendar, maintenance windows, pre-flight checks.



27. Traffic spike after market news causing outage

Detection: sudden traffic surge.

Root: insufficient autoscaling policy.

Fix: HPA tuning, load test for spike scenarios.



28. Slow dependency (third-party API) causing cascading failures

Detection: app latency but infra OK.

Root: external dependency slowness, no timeouts.

Fix: timeouts, circuit breakers, fallbacks.



29. File system fill-up on shared NFS

Detection: app IO errors.

Root: no cleaning of temp files.

Fix: retention policy, monitoring, archive strategy.



30. Manual on-call handovers causing confusion

Detection: missed alerts at shift changes.

Root: unstructured handover.

Fix: standard handover notes, shared dashboards, rota tooling.



31. Configuration mismatch between environments

Detection: only prod failing.

Root: inconsistent config management.

Fix: single source of truth (Git), environment overlays.



32. Slow database queries during peak

Detection: DB CPU high, slow queries.

Root: missing indexes or bad query patterns.

Fix: query optimization, index tuning, caching.



33. Network segmentation change breaking services

Detection: sudden connectivity errors.

Root: firewall/ACL change.

Fix: pre-change testing, network observability, standard change templates.



34. Legacy job scheduler causing missed jobs

Detection: jobs randomly not running.

Root: old scheduler with no HA.

Fix: migrate to AutoSys/modern scheduler, add HA and monitoring.



35. Unexpected rollback causing data inconsistency

Detection: some users see old data.

Root: rollback of app without DB compatibility check.

Fix: backward-compatible DB changes, clear rollback strategy.





---

D. Security-Aligned / Risk / Governance (36–50)

36. Excessive production access for support engineers

Detection: audit findings.

Root: historical “everyone has access” culture.

Fix: RBAC, break-glass access, session recording.



37. Unencrypted secrets in config

Detection: config review.

Root: secrets in plain text.

Fix: secrets manager, sealed-secrets, strict reviews.



38. Shadow changes in production

Detection: change didn’t appear in change logs.

Root: direct edits on servers.

Fix: remove direct access, enforce changes only via pipeline.



39. Missing audit logs for admin operations

Detection: RCA needed proof of actions.

Root: incomplete logging.

Fix: audit logging on all admin operations.



40. Sensitive logs exposed (PII in logs)

Detection: log review.

Root: devs logging too much detail.

Fix: logging standards, PII scrubbing, lint checks in CI.



41. Broken TLS configuration on internal services

Detection: security scan.

Root: outdated cipher suites.

Fix: central TLS policy, automated config generation.



42. Third-party library vulnerability (Log4j-style)

Detection: security bulletin.

Root: no SBOM tracking.

Fix: dependency scanning in CI, SBOM, patch runbook.



43. Backups not restorable

Detection: test restore failed.

Root: only “backup success” monitored, not restore.

Fix: regular restore tests, documented RPO/RTO.



44. Inconsistent password/secret rotation

Detection: expired credentials outages.

Root: manual tracking.

Fix: rotation schedule, automation via secret manager.



45. API rate limits missing

Detection: abusive clients slowed whole system.

Root: no rate limiting or quotas.

Fix: API gateway with limits, per-client quotas.



46. No segregation between lower and prod environments

Detection: data leak risk identified.

Root: prod-like data in lower envs.

Fix: data masking, separate credentials, strict access.



47. Incorrectly configured S3/object storage bucket

Detection: security review.

Root: over-permissive access policies.

Fix: least-privilege IAM policies, encryption and access logs.



48. Lack of formal risk scoring for changes

Detection: all changes treated the same.

Root: no risk-based change model.

Fix: risk scoring (low/med/high), approvals based on risk.



49. No standard onboarding for new services into SRE

Detection: services in prod with no monitoring or runbooks.

Root: no onboarding checklist.

Fix: SRE readiness checklist (monitoring, alerts, runbooks, DR, security).



50. Inadequate documentation for critical runbooks

Detection: delays in incident response.

Root: outdated or missing runbooks.

Fix: documentation standards, periodic runbook drills, versioning in Git.




Pick 5–7 of these and rehearse them deeply with full STAR answers.


---

3️⃣ Downloadable PDF Cheat Sheet

I’ve created a concise PDF you can quickly revise before the interview:

👉 Download the Lloyds SRE Manager Cheat Sheet

It includes:

Your positioning (how to introduce yourself)

A clean 2-minute intro script

5 flagship stories to reuse

STAR template

Cybersecurity-friendly phrases to repeat

Do/Don’t checklist before interview



---

If you want, next we can do a mock Q&A where you type your answer and I refine it to sound sharper and more aligned to Lloyds + cybersecurity mindset.